I have always wondered whether the presidents that history claims are the worst were popular during their administrations. That is, maybe their policies, or lack thereof, proved to be failures. But that also doesn't mean they didn't have followers and people who thought they were doing well. Our current administration is experiencing historically low approval rates . But don't tell that to his rally-goers, flag-bearers, and Bible-buyers. So, how does history determine where a president fits on the worst-to-best scale? I'm sure there's subjectivity that goes into that decision. But here's something that I found interesting that I'll use to weigh on the subject. This article writes of James Buchanan's unpopularity, and finishes with this line: "In comparison with strong Presidents, he said, “weak Presidents, men like Fillmore, Buchanan and Harding … bring democracy into disrepute and expose the Constitution to grave perils,” he said." How do...
I knew it. Michael Jackson died in 2009, and we all wondered who could take his place in pop culture. Now, I'm not sure anyone will be able to do what Michael did. But in 2014, I knew who would come closest. By then, Bruno Mars was already successful. Obviously, because he played the Super Bowl that year. The man emerged playing a drum solo, and I remember watching that entire performance and thinking, 'He's the one.' He's incredibly talented, and everything he touches turns to gold. When I listened to his new song today , I heard what I heard back then. This is a great song! Stay blessed...john